Heinrich Böll Foundation Joins Anti-Sex League

With all the eyes on her sweet little bosom, I may mention the little extra level of sexiness: The ring on her finger.
Internet pillories are no rare phenomenon these days. And yet the recent launch of the new website agentin.org raised some eyebrows. Target of the blog are any voices critical of gender mainstreaming extravaganzas. Reason for concern is that the site does not only target public figures as we know it from the SPLC in the US, but ordinary ‘anti-feminist citizens’ in an easily accessible list, merely sorted alphabetically.


Sure enough public figures are included to smear ordinary individuals with guilt by association. Editors of the pilloary are Prof Elisabeth Tuider of University Kassel, Sociologist Andreas Kemper and a gentleman named Henning von Bargen of the Gunda Werner Institute, the sub-organisation of the Heinrich Böll foundation that is officially credited with running the website.


The Foundation is a political think tank closely tied to the German Green Party and has nothing to do with Nobel Price Laureate Heinrich Böll. Unlike US think tanks, the Heinrich Böll Foundation is financed by tax payer money.


Some Germans take it with humor and try to get on. Here is my bid.


When the Lord created both sexes he liked women’s hips tender, breasts pert, voices bright and their flowing hair long.


Craving for the protection by and from muscular, hard men they long for a potential father who stays with them in loyalty and fidelity to support her child raising efforts.


While sons may dance and daughters may wrestle we enjoy our kids to behave as we expect it of the two sexes. The undecided may flip a coin, non-conformity is appreciated and is on par with conformity if it feels good.


May the manly dagger of hard flesh plunge into women’s soft sheaths as often as possible. Praise the Lord!


via DDR 2.0: Die Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung und die „Abschussliste“ der Andersdenkenden — philosophia perennis

and http://www.journalistenwatch.com/2017/07/21/agentin-der-neue-online-pranger-im-internet/


The Globalist One World Currency Will Look A Lot Like Bitcoin, by Brandon Smith

SLL does not pretend to expertise in cryptocurrency, but Brandon’s Smith hypothesis certainly sounds plausible. From Smith at alt-market.com:

This week the International Monetary Fund shocked some economic analysts with an announcement that America was “no longer first in the world” as a major economic growth engine. This stinging assertion falls exactly in line with the narrative out of the latest G20 summit; that the U.S. is fading away leaving the door open for countries like Germany and China to join forces and fill the power void. I wrote about this rising relationship between these two nations as well as the ongoing controlled demolition of America’s economy in my article ‘The New World Order Will Begin With Germany And China’.

I find it interesting that the IMF is once again taking the lead on perpetuating the image of a failing U.S., just as they often push for the concept of a single global currency system to replace the dollar as the world reserve. The most common faulty counter-argument I run into when outlining the globalist agenda to supplant the dollar with the Special Drawing Rights basket system is that “the IMF is a U.S. government controlled organization that would never undermine U.S. authority.” Obviously, the people who make this argument have been thoroughly duped.

The IMF is constantly and actively undermining America’s economic position, because the IMF is NOT an American controlled organization; its loyalty is to globalism as an ideology as well as the international financiers that dominate central banking. America’s supposed “veto power” within the IMF is incidental and meaningless — it has not stopped the IMF from chasing the replacement of the the dollar structure and forming the fiscal ties that stand as the root of what they sometimes call the “global economic reset.”

To illustrate how the IMF narrative supports the globalist narrative, I suggest comparing the 2009 “predictions” of George Soros on China replacing the U.S. as the world’s economic engine to the IMF’s latest analysis on the decline of America.

The IMF cares only about centralizing everything, from currency to trade to governance. If the sacrifice of the old world system (the U.S. dollar) is required to create their new world system, then that is what they will do. If you have read my article ‘The Federal Reserve Is A Saboteur — And The “Experts” Are Oblivious’, then you understand that the Fed is also perfectly on board with this plan for a global reset. The central bankers, regardless of the nation they happen to reside, stick together and function as agents of larger controlling organisms like the Bank for International Settlements.

To continue reading: The Globalist One World Currency Will Look A Lot Like Bitcoin


via The Globalist One World Currency Will Look A Lot Like Bitcoin, by Brandon Smith — STRAIGHT LINE LOGIC

The Strange Case of Franco A

The following story happened a while ago, but I have a strong feeling that I may want to come back to it at some point. So here it is.

The arrest of a German army officer suspected of plotting the assassination of leftist politicians and high-ranking state officials has supposedly exposed the operations of neo-Nazi forces at the highest levels of the German military (Bundeswehr).

It was claimed that the suspected officer-terrorist was part of a broader network of fascists within the Bundeswehr, and that his activities were known to his superiors and covered up by them.

Criticisms of the military by Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen has met public outrage as she was seen as unsupportive of the soldiers under her care. She subsequently started a witchhunt removing anything from military bases that reminded of the Wehrmacht.

Lieutenant Franco A, 28, was arrested after coming to the attention of Austrian police when he sought to retrieve a weapon hidden at the airport in Vienna. It quickly emerged that the officer had been leading a double life. In addition to his activities in the Bundeswehr, Franco A, who does not speak a word of Arabic, had registered as a Syrian refugee and been recognized as such.

He apparently intended to carry out a terror attack under a false flag. A police search of his home uncovered a list of possible targets, which included, together with leftist politicians and activists, Justice Minister Heiko Maas and former German President Joachim Gauck (and somehow not Merkel).

The police have also recovered shells and handguns from a 24-year-old accomplice, who was arrested, too.

In 2014, Franco A’s graduate thesis at the French military university Saint-Cyr was rejected on the grounds that it was not a scholarly work, but rather “a radical nationalist, racist appeal,” calling for “existing conditions to be adapted to the alleged natural law of racial purity.” The responsible French general advised Franco A.’s German superiors to sack him, but the latter concluded that he was not a racist.

The neo-Nazi views of the first lieutenant were an open secret in the French town of Illkirch, where he served in a Franco-German unit. Investigators from the Bundeswehr have found “indications of right-wing and racist ideas” in his room. In addition to a swastika carved on an assault rifle, they discovered pictures glorifying the Wehrmacht.

The military intelligence service is currently investigating 275 extreme right-wing suspects.

In other words, a Nazi intended to commit an act of terror against the least important yet best protected public figures, trying all the way to look like a refugee from Syria. Or a media story that you just must believe…or else you are a ‘Nazi’.

based on Neo-Nazi network in German army exposed — American Everyman

Court Forbids Mentioning Bavarian Leader of Conservative Party AfD in Intelligence Service Report

Bildergebnis für petr bystron afd

On a regular basis the agencies of dubious German Intelligence Agency Verfassungsschutz publish a report that serves as an anti-social hit list.

Victim Petr Bystron who won the legal battle suspected the Agency to be politicized. “This is a sounding slap in the face for [Bavaria’s Interior Minister] Hermann’s dirty election campaign trickeries.”

The court confirms that the insinuendo game following such a publication is damaging to Bystron’s reputation and participation in public life.

A mere remark about the „Identitären Bewegung“, also monitored by the Verfassungsschutz and included in their libellous reports, led to Bystrons observation.

AfD announced to fight for the Verfassungsschutz to be put under the auspices of an independent agent such as the Supreme Court to depoliticise the service.

AfD, however, does not support a thorough abolition of the agency.

via Gericht verbietet Innenminister Herrmann, die Nennung von AfD-Chef Bystron im Verfassungschutzbericht! — volksbetrug.net

Death of German Soldiers in Mali Speaks Volumes

A special permission was necessary to allow the machine, a helicopter of the type ‘Tiger’, to be deployed in the desert with its temperature limit at 42 degrees Celsius and not more. Gao in Mali is known for hard natural conditions. There is the sand brushing against the rotors, the simmering heat, the glazing sun.

As newspaper JF reports rumors that political pressure to participate in military missions abroad were mounting. At the same time the model ‘Tiger’ was considered too outlandish to find pilots flying it. In fact pilots are so scarce that those flying were lacking as training personnel for future pilots.

Most annoying, however, is that Germany did not discuss the value of such military missions and the proper allocation of our ressources. The media silence again – deafening.

source: https://jungefreiheit.de/debatte/kommentar/2017/berlin-in-der-verantwortung/

Eastern German gym bans ethnic minorities from joining – out of fear of terrorists

Bildergebnis für cair my jihad is going to the gym

A gym in the eastern German state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has come in for criticism after it posted a notice in its window telling ethnic minorities they weren’t welcome anymore, German media reported on Thursday.

via Eastern German gym bans ethnic minorities from joining – out of fear of terrorists — The Local

Google Search Engine Restrict Access to Independent News Sources

By Andre Damon and Niles Niemuth
27 July 2017

In the three months since Internet monopoly Google announced plans to keep users from accessing “fake news,” the global traffic rankings of a broad range of left-wing, progressive, anti-war and democratic rights organizations have fallen significantly.

On April 25, 2017, Google announced that it had implemented changes to its search service to make it harder for users to access what it called “low-quality” information such as “conspiracy theories” and “fake news.”

The company said in a blog post that the central purpose of the change to its search algorithm was to give the search giant greater control in identifying content deemed objectionable by its guidelines. It declared that it had “improved our evaluation methods and made algorithmic updates” in order “to surface more authoritative content.”

Google continued, “Last month, we updated our Search Quality Rater Guidelines to provide more detailed examples of low-quality webpages for raters to appropriately flag.” These moderators are instructed to flag “upsetting user experiences,” including pages that present “conspiracy theories,” unless “the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.”

Google does not explain precisely what it means by the term “conspiracy theory.” Using the broad and amorphous category of fake news, the aim of the change to Google’s search system is to restrict access to alternative web sites, whose coverage and interpretation of events conflict with those of such establishment media outlets as the New York Times and the Washington Post.

By flagging content in such a way that it does not appear in the first one or two pages of a search result, Google is able to effectively block users’ access to it. Given the fact that vast amounts of web traffic are influenced by search results, Google is able to effectively conceal or bury content to which it objects through the manipulation of search rankings.

Just last month, the European Commission fined the company $2.7 billion for manipulating search results to inappropriately direct users to its own comparison shopping service, Google Shopping. Now, it appears that Google is using these criminal methods to block users from accessing political viewpoints the company deems objectionable.

The World Socialist Web Site has been targeted by Google’s new “evaluation methods.” While in April 2017, 422,460 visits to the WSWS originated from Google searches, the figure has dropped to an estimated 120,000 this month, a fall of more than 70 percent.

Even when using search terms such as “socialist” and “socialism,” readers have informed us that they find it increasingly difficult to locate the World Socialist Web Site in Google searches.

Referals from Google searches to the WSWS have fallen by about 70 percent

According to Google’s webmaster tools service, the number of searches resulting in users seeing content from the World Socialist Web Site (that is, a WSWS article appeared in a Google search) fell from 467,890 a day to 138,275 over the past three months. The average position of articles in searches, meanwhile, fell from 15.9 to 37.2 over the same period.

David North, chairperson of the International Editorial Board of the WSWS, stated that Google is engaged in political censorship.

“The World Socialist Web Site has been in existence for nearly 20 years,” he said, “and it has developed a large international audience. During this past spring, the number of individual visits to the WSWS each month exceeded 900,000.

“While a significant percentage of our readers enter the WSWS directly, many web users access the site through search engines, of which Google is the most widely used. There is no innocent explanation for the extraordinarily sharp fall in readers, virtually overnight, coming from Google searches.

“Google’s claim that it is protecting readers from ‘fake news’ is a politically motivated lie. Google, a massive monopoly, with the closest ties to the state and intelligence agencies, is blocking access to the WSWS and other left and progressive web sites through a system of rigged searches.”

In the three months since Google implemented the changes to its search engine, fewer people have accessed left-wing and anti-war news sites. Based on information available on Alexa analytics, other sites that have experienced sharp drops in ranking include WikiLeaks, Alternet, Counterpunch, Global Research, Consortium News and Truthout. Even prominent democratic rights groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and Amnesty International appear to have been hit.

A broad range of left-wing, progressive, and anti-war sites have had their traffic rankings fall in recent months

According to Google Trends, the term “fake news” roughly quadrupled in popularity in early November, around the time of the US election, as Democrats, establishment media outlets and intelligence agencies sought to blame “false information” for the electoral victory of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton.

On November 14, the New York Times proclaimed that Google and Facebook “faced mounting criticism over how fake news on their sites may have influenced the presidential election’s outcome,” and they would be taking measures to combat “fake news.”

Ten days later, the Washington Post published an article, “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say,” which cited an anonymous group known as PropOrNot that compiled a list of “fake news” sites spreading “Russian propaganda.”

The list included several sites categorized by the group as “left-wing.” Significantly, it targeted globalresearch.ca, which often reposts articles from the World Socialist Web Site.

After widespread criticism of what was little more than a blacklist of anti-war and anti-establishment sites, the Washington Post was forced to publish a retraction, declaring, “The Post, which did not name any of the sites, does not itself vouch for the validity of PropOrNot’s findings.”

On April 7, Bloomberg News reported that Google was working directly with the Washington Post and the New York Times to “fact-check” articles and eliminate “fake news.” This was followed by Google’s new search methodology.

Three months later, out of the 17 sites declared to be “fake news” by the Washington Post ’s discredited blacklist, 14 had their global ranking fall. The average decline of the global reach of all of these sites is 25 percent, and some sites saw their global reach fall by as much as 60 percent.

“The actions of Google constitute political censorship and are a blatant attack on free speech,” North stated. “At a time when public distrust of establishment media is widespread, this corporate giant is exploiting its monopolistic position to restrict public access to a broad spectrum of news and critical analysis.”

source: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/07/27/goog-j27.html