New Meryl Streep Trash Movie

I have watched this trailer a couple of days ago and my eyes are still rolling.

Meryl Streep stars in a new political movie called ‘The Post’. As the title suggests the artwork is about the newspaper Washington Post and it is based on a real story; only that, of course, it isn’t based on a real story.

The topic is the release of the Pentagon Papers which were first published by Daniel Ellsberg in the New York Times in 1971. In modern cultural Marxist indoctrination mania this basis causes some headache. Daniel Ellsberg is not a woman. Even Meryl Streep, the most overrated actress in the world, wasn’t asked to play him as a man. Instead the Pentagon Papers must now have been published by the Washington Post who had a woman chief editor at the time.

The story therefore now circles arount the Post who were handed a part of the papers by Ellsberg. They were almost entirely risk-free. Even an attempt to put out an injunction against the paper by the general attorney was immediately struck down by the district court. In the movie, Streep fears jail and the destruction of ‘her’ company. The US Supreme Court is feared for handing out prison sentences. It heavily relies on the stupidity of the audience.

The twist is now that the weight of the world lasts on the shoulders of a woman, a woman no man had confidence in. The times they were sexist, not the New York Times, the 70s. The men: white. The president: a conservative. Streep faces pure evil.

Didn’t she already make that very same movie? I still shake from the memory of the anti-Thatcher slander ‘The Iron Lady’. The Iron Lady was a full-blown, disgusting character assassination. It has in common with the upcoming movie that it rewrote history, heaping one lie on top of the next, while declaring the ‘likability’ factor of the leading character to be the portrayal of a feminist harpy. Pass the popcorn bag to whoever needs to vomit!

 

 

Advertisements

Boxing Champion Manuel Charr Is Not A German

When I first heard that a German was declared WBA heavyweight Champion in boxing I was just happy for him. I don’t watch traditional boxing, but I believe in the moral function of sports and the importance of supporting their appreciation. Finally, decades after Max Schmeling won the title for Germany in 1930 a new hero seemed to have risen like a phoenix from the ashes of effeminate decay.

Now we learn that Manuel Charr is not a German. He is an Arab from Lebanon. That does not take away from his honor and success, and I’d like to take the chance to congratulate him now: well done, warrior! Before him the most successful ‘German’ boxers were the Klitschko brothers from Ukraine.

What strikes me now is that we don’t have successful German martial artists. We also don’t have a notable rugby team. In fact the most macho sport Germans can compete in is Association Football, a sport where the fans are regularly more violent than the athletes because their rough nature is not sufficiently satisfied. This is both cause and symptom of a moral decline.

The social network Facebook once made a study that showed in what regions of the US college football teams are most often ‘liked’. The most enthusiastic region was the South, followed by the Mid West, rural areas were more thrilled than urban ones.

In conservative areas moral men are hard men. In liberal areas immoral men run rampant unopposed by effeminate weaklings. Prisons are filled with hard, immoral men from leftist areas and crime rates are low where the well-raised, religious men are the hard men. The South and the Mid West are also the regions that are most successful in military recruitment. American Football is just about as safe and just about as violent to attract a sizable number of manly fans and to encourage men to be real men.

It should be no surprise that one of the most successful countries in modern history, the United Kingdom, is also the birthplace of many of the world’s most popular sports. Athletic activity, it seems, advances fairness, camaraderie, ambition and the neccessary restraint to uphold a framework of rules. At the same time, English, unlike any other language, has integrated the fuzzy logic that good men are ‘gentle’. So far Britain’s aristocracy could offset this notion by serving their country in the military, leading the nation by example. Prince Harry is swooned by the ladies for being the rough and tumble prince, who speaks fondly about killing enemy soldiers. When the tabloid Sun was criticised for publishing a picture of him being naked, with his genitals on display, they defended themselves with praise: Harry is our military hero! I suppose, the Queen was amused.

But what does it mean if Germany loses its sense of manliness. First, we lose the ideals for how a man should be. The virtue of restrained passed down to us from our ancient Roman heritage vanishes. A boxer may not bite the ear in the fray and a sexually aroused man must accept a woman’s ‘no’.

By losing our sense of manliness we also seem to weaken traits that men are born with. Men want to defend their family, women, and children. The protection traditionally extended to larger units and to the entire nation. Men sacrifice a lot to achieve a goal. What does it mean for a nation if men don’t want to defend the borders? And is it a coincidence that man are insulted more regularly since the debate about borders and migrations has risen to prominence?

But not all can be explained with ‘feminist’ aggression. Since decades the testosterone level of Western males is sinking (this study for the US is age controlled). This is paralleled by a rapid decline in the number of sperms per ejaculation. Both is sometimes attributed to the evil toxic industries that (could) poison us all, but many scientists see an abating interest in sports as the main reason. So far the number of sperms is still considered high enough to procreate, but with the ideal of marriage went the wishes to have children anyway. Without certain ideals men won’t marry and men won’t accept a ‘no’ to be in the way of their sexual advances.

The left has done a great job using those as pawns who have a harder time striving for gender ideals. We are showered with transgender and gay issues on a daily basis now. To make a long story short: gays and trannies are not the problem. People who lived in loving straight relationship (so their own account), but come out glamorously as ‘gay’ are a concern (e.g. soccer star Thomas Hitzelsperger).

We see a surge of fake gays and fake trannies, of people who actually don’t have a hard time to conform to an ideal. I also don’t mind bisexuals. If there is a partner you love, go for him/her! But why do singles glamorously announce that they want to live a gay life now?

The problem is not trannies. Real trannies by definition match gender ideals of the aspired sex. Generally they do so much better than the general public. But why is there so much fuss about pseudo-trannies who simply cannot throw a coin?

There is also no problem with girly men and butch women. They can just be admired as individuals as everybody else. Ideals don’t compel us to comply, they guide us. Sports are a way to shape us without force, gently.

Boxing Champion Manuel Charr has a dark past. He was a hard man before he was a moral one. His criminal record includes theft and grave bodily harm, even an attempted murder. However, he has been law-abiding for some years now. His path reflects his Arab background, a culture with a very mixed moral record, with strengths and weaknesses different from our own. His fortitude did not rise out of a German culture of strong men. Now, he seeks the German citizenship. Will he be held dear as a hero?

The Desolate State of The Police in The UK

She let’s a lot of people off the hook at the end of the video and puts the onus of the blame on bankers. That is nonsense, of course.

The Decline of Twitter

Becky raises an important point. Because internet platform, just like the media, become less and less profitable they are sustained by other forces than the market. Most conservatives fail to see that. These tools, the media and social networks, are politically influential. Their worth is not only what a free market attributes to their services. They also have a worth for nefarious elites who try to control our behavior, yes, even our thoughts. The (social) media is therefore exclusively focused on appealing to rich, ideologically left-wing investors and censors accordingly.

Milo Meets Katie Hopkins

Warning: This is too sassy for my taste, but I think I should not hide it.

German court orders release of soldier accused of attack plan

Now it’s official: The Franco A case had little to no basis in reality. Reuters says now the suspect was release for lack of evidence. So they don’t have to follow up on their obvious nonsense.

BERLIN (Reuters) – A German court on Wednesday ordered the release of an army officer suspected of planning to carry out an attack on politicians and incriminate asylum seekers, saying there was not enough evidence to keep him in detention.

The officer, named only as Franco A., was arrested in April in a case that shocked Germans and stirred a debate about the depth of right-wing radicalism in the country’s military.

Prosecutors suspected that Franco A., along with two accomplices, wanted to implicate refugees in their planned attack by posing under a false identity as an asylum seeker.

Former president Joachim Gauck and Justice Minister Heiko Maas were on a list of possible targets prepared by the suspects, who wanted to make their attack look like the work of Islamist militants, prosecutors had said.

However, the Federal Court of Justice ruled on Wednesday that there was not enough evidence that Franco A. was preparing an attack to keep him in detention, even if there were some grounds for suspicion.

Investigators must now make clear whether they have enough evidence to bring the officer to trial. A suspected accomplice was freed in July pending trial, while the other suspect was released for lack of evidence.

The case had put pressure on Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government, with her close ally, Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen, facing criticism for failing to deal with right-wing extremism in the army and also because she implied that most soldiers were right-wing radicals.

Franco A., who served with an army battalion stationed in France, had used a fake identity to register as a Syrian refugee and moved into a shelter for migrants in Bavaria even though he speaks no Arabic.

The soldier had previously been detained in late January by Austrian authorities on suspicion of having hidden an illegal gun in a bathroom at Vienna’s main airport.

(Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal and Thorsten Severin; editing by Mark Heinrich)

 

Milo Meets David Horowitz